Abstract

A recent study by Middleton et al. (2008; Mar Ecol Prog Ser 371:117-129) characteriz- ing mangrove swamps impounded for mosquito control in Florida has a number of problems that weaken some of the resulting conclusions. We examine some of these issues, which we divide into (1) errors of fact, (2) methodological problems, (3) unwarranted conclusions. Errors of fact include incorrect historical assertions, incorrect site descriptions, and inaccurate statements on the general effects of impoundments. Methodological problems include inadequate sampling for the stated pur- pose, in particular using results of one-time sampling of very small marsh areas to characterize entire marshes and groups of marshes; defining inadequate controls; use of heterogeneous experimental treatment groups, including highly atypical and unrepresentative sites within experimental treat- ments; selective sampling; and others. Unwarranted conclusions include the characterization and comparison of marshes and management strategies based upon unrepresentative sampling, and the attribution of differences in habitat function as a result of management strategy without any experi- mental evidence to suggest such an effect. We make suggestions for mitigating some of these issues.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.