Abstract

Despite the promising ideas of lead users, the success rate of the open innovation process remains low if no proper personal characteristics are attached to the external contributor. The knowledge about the essential characteristic elements of lead users is crucial to select the right lead users in the early stage of the NPD. By filling the research gap, we performed a systematic literature review about the required personal characteristics of lead users. The resulting 45 studies demonstrated that diverse characteristics are required in different stages of an NDP which vary in the consumer and industrial context. According to our research results, we made a contribution to the theory by extending the lead user method in the form of a partial theory. We also found that in the case of incremental innovations, companies apply their technical knowledge and do not require additional expertise from users, while in the case of radical innovations, firms only involve external users with high technological competencies in the development stage of the NDP. We identified similarities and differences of the required lead users’ personal characteristics in the consumer and industrial contexts. Thus, our study provides a better awareness for business leaders on the selection of lead users for their NPD process, reducing the time-to-market ratio of the product and increasing profit.

Highlights

  • IntroductionFirms are increasingly opening their boundaries and applying various methods to identify user innovations [1] and tap users’ product knowledge and experience [2,3]

  • Open innovation supports corporate growth and profitability

  • Quality information from lead users [9] and their systematic design freedom [10] results in better product development. von Hippel first defined the term lead user, assigned two main attributes to identify them: “lead users face needs that will be general in a marketplace—but face them months or years before the bulk of that marketplace encounters them, and lead users are positioned to benefit significantly by obtaining a solution to those needs” [8] (p. 13)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Firms are increasingly opening their boundaries and applying various methods to identify user innovations [1] and tap users’ product knowledge and experience [2,3]. Innovating firms involve users [4,5], customers [6] and patients [7] in the “fuzzy front end” of their new product development (NPD). [8] states that average users are not suitable for developing novel product attributes because they cannot accurately determine future market needs. Leading-edge users with real-life usage experience can provide accurate information on the needs for product development. The high expected benefit and the superior trend position are strong predictors for co-creation [11]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call