Abstract

IntroductionPrevious analyses concluded that patients initiating treatment with sitagliptin are older and have more comorbidities than patients initiating treatment with other oral antihyperglycemic agents (OAHAs). However, these studies focused on the general population or subjects ≤ 65 years of age. We sought to compare differences in baseline characteristics of elderly patients (≥ 65 years of age) with T2DM initiating sitagliptin vs. non-DPP-4 inhibitor (non-DPP-4i) OAHA in the MarketScan® Medicare Supplemental Database.MethodsRelevant patients were identified in the MarketScan® Medicare Supplemental Database and categorized according to the complexity of their antihyperglycemic treatment: initiating monotherapy, escalating to dual combination therapy, or escalating to triple combination therapy. Within each category, the comparison between patients initiating use of sitagliptin or non-DPP-4i OAHA was made within three age groups: 65–74, 75–84, and ≥ 85 years. Gender and comorbidity recorded within the 12 months prior to the index date (date of initiation/escalation of treatment) were assessed as baseline characteristics in each group. Between-treatment group differences in each covariate were compared using standardized differences.ResultsPatients with T2DM who initiated treatment with sitagliptin tended to be older and were more likely to have a pre-treatment history of arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, renal failure, and stroke than those initiating non-DPP-4i OAHAs, with the most pronounced differences observed between patients initiating monotherapy in all three age groups. As treatment complexity advanced to dual combination therapy, the differences were attenuated and mostly observed in the 75–84 and ≥ 85 age groups. In patients aged 65–74 years initiating triple therapy, no differences were observed between groups.ConclusionPatients ≥ 65 years with T2DM initiating sitagliptin tend to be older and have more comorbidities than those prescribed other classes of OAHA. Appropriate adjustment is required to minimize the impact of potential confounding and channeling bias in any comparative analyses including users of sitagliptin.FundingMerck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Highlights

  • Previous analyses concluded that patients initiating treatment with sitagliptin are older and have more comorbidities than patients initiating treatment with other oral antihyperglycemic agents (OAHAs)

  • As treatment complexity advanced to dual combination therapy, the differences were attenuated and mostly observed in the 75–84 and C 85 age groups

  • Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who initiated treatment with sitagliptin tended to be older than those initiating other non-DPP-4 OAHAs (Fig. 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Previous analyses concluded that patients initiating treatment with sitagliptin are older and have more comorbidities than patients initiating treatment with other oral antihyperglycemic agents (OAHAs) These studies focused on the general population or subjects B 65 years of age. We sought to compare differences in baseline characteristics of elderly patients (C 65 years of age) with T2DM initiating sitagliptin vs non-DPP-4 inhibitor (non-DPP-4i) OAHA in the MarketScanÒ Medicare Supplemental Database. Previous analyses of sitagliptin-prescribing patterns concluded that new users of sitagliptin were more likely to be older and have more comorbidities and complications, greater use of prescription medications, and more physician visits compared to new users of other oral antihyperglycemic agents (OAHAs) [13,14,15,16]. We sought to compare the baseline characteristics of elderly patients with T2DM initiating sitagliptin vs. non-DPP-4i OAHAs in the Medicare Supplemental Database

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.