Abstract

U.S. catfish producers have been exploring the adoption of alternative-production technologies (intensive-aeration, in-pond raceways, and split-pond systems) in recent years for achieving cost efficiencies. A multi-state (Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi) survey was conducted to identify specific reasons influencing the decisions of producers whether or not to adopt these alternative catfish production technologies. High yield and greater control over the production process were the major reasons for the adoption of alternative catfish production technologies. High investment costs and increased risks associated with these technologies were the main reasons for not adopting new technologies. Early adopters had significantly larger farms, greater numbers of ponds, and a significantly greater percentage of use of hybrid catfish. Econometric analysis suggested that characteristics of the technology such as productivity, perceived risk, and adoption costs, influenced early adoption decisions. Institutional factors such as prior involvement in Extension/research programs and farm characteristics of the scale of operation also shaped adoption decisions. Understanding the characteristics (of the technology, farms, and producers) that lead to greater adoption, may provide guidance to increase the rate of successful transfer of new technologies to fish producers.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call