Abstract
The resolution performance of various complementary coded radar waveforms is characterized. Numerical results on peak sidelobe level ratio (PSLR) and integrated sidelobe level ratio (ISLR) are presented, and a comparison is made. It is concluded that complementary coded sets result in better overall PSLR and ISLR performance than complementary coded pairs in the presence of target fluctuation. Therefore, the use of complementary code sets should be preferred over the use of complementary code pairs. Increasing the number of subsequences with a corresponding reduction in the number of chips per subsequence is shown to improve the resolution performance. >
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
