Abstract

Objective: To evaluate if cardiopulmonary coupling (CPC) calculated sleep quality (SQI) may have a role in identifying children that may benefit from other intervention than early adenotonsillectomy (eAT) in management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: A secondary analysis of electrocardiogram-signals (ECG) and oxygen saturation-data (SpO2) collected during polysomnography-studies in the prospective multicenter Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Trial (CHAT) to calculate CPC-SQI and apnea hypopnea index (AHI) was executed. In the CHAT, children 5–9 years with OSA without prolonged oxyhemoglobin desaturations were randomly assigned to adenotonsillectomy (eAT) or watchful waiting with supportive care (WWSC). The primary outcomes were to document change in attention and executive function evaluated with the Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment (NEPSY). In our analysis, children in the WWSC-group with spontaneous resolution of OSA (AHIObstructive < 1.0) and high-sleep quality (SQI ≥ 75) after 7-months were compared with children that showed residual OSA. Results: Of the 227 children randomized to WWSC, 203 children had available data at both baseline and 7-month follow-up. The group that showed resolution of OSA at month 7 (n = 43, 21%) were significantly more likely to have high baseline SQI 79.96 [CI95% 75.05, 84.86] vs. 72.44 [CI95% 69.50, 75.39], p = 0.005, mild OSA AHIObstructive 4.01 [CI95% 2.34, 5.68] vs. 6.52 [CI95% 5.47, 7.57], p= 0.005, higher NEPSY-attention-executive function score 106.22 [CI95% 101.67, 110.77] vs. 101.14 [CI95% 98.58, 103.72], p = 0.038 and better quality of life according to parents 83.74 [CI95% 78.95, 88.54] vs. 77.51 [74.49, 80.53], p = 0.015. The groups did not differ when clinically evaluated by Mallampati score, Friedman palate position or sleep related questionnaires. Conclusions: Children that showed resolution of OSA were more likely to have high-SQI and mild OSA, be healthy-weight and have better attention and executive function and quality of life at baseline. As this simple method to evaluate sleep quality and OSA is based on analyzing signals that are simple to collect, the method is practical for sleep-testing, over multiple nights and on multiple occasions. This method may assist physicians and parents to determine the most appropriate therapy for their child as some children may benefit from WWSC rather than interventions. If the parameters can be used to plan care a priori, this would provide a fundamental shift in how childhood OSA is diagnosed and managed.

Highlights

  • Sleep disordered breathing (SDB), characterized by abnormal respiratory and ventilation patterns during sleep, is a prevalent condition in children with disease severity ranging from primary habitual snoring to complete obstruction of the airway [1,2]

  • There was no significant difference comparing the groups in Mallampati score, Friedman palate position, symptoms of Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) evaluated with OSA-18 or PSQ-SRBD or behavior evaluated with the Child Behavior Checklist and Conners DSM-IV

  • With sleep and its correlated outcome metrics such as quality of life and better cognitive functioning in the attention and executive domain being key factors in the decision to decide on a therapy, the results indicate that this simple method to evaluate sleep may assist physicians and parents to determine the most appropriate therapy for their child because some children may benefit from watchful waiting rather than interventions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB), characterized by abnormal respiratory and ventilation patterns during sleep, is a prevalent condition in children with disease severity ranging from primary habitual snoring (prevalence of 6–25%) to complete obstruction of the airway (estimated prevalence 3–6%) [1,2]. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is diagnosed in children when obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) is ≥1.0 per hour of sleep [3]. There is often not a clear correlation between clinical symptoms and OSA severity. The literature indicates that the outcome of physical examinations such as the Mallampati score or the Friedman palate position, or subjective sleep questionnaires do not correlate well with severity of airway obstruction and may not be reliable when evaluating children for OSA [7,8,9]. Based on the results of the Childhood Adenotonsillectomy Study for Children with OSA (CHAT) the ability of otolaryngologists to correctly predict the presence of Polysomnography (PSG)-confirmed

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.