Characteristics of a telecytology consultation service

Abstract

Although numerous reports describe the application of remote video microscopy to pathologic diagnosis (telepathology), only a few address some of the special issues surrounding remote cytologic diagnosis (telecytology). These studies have generally suggested a high correlation between telecytologic diagnoses and those arising from direct examination of the glass slides, but factors affecting the clinical utility of routine cytologic diagnosis have not been examined. In this report, we describe our experience in telecytologic consultation on 99 cases seen at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology between October 1995 and November 1999. The mean time between receipt of the telecytologic images and the contributor receipt of the faxed report was 9.9 hours (median, 5.13 hours). Using stringent criteria for agreement, we find fair to good (48%) concordance between the contributor's impression and the consultant's opinion. The concordance between the consultant's telecytologic diagnosis and the subsequent glass slide diagnosis is imperfect; in 8 (31%) of 26 cases in which the glass slide was sent after the telecytology consultation, a minor discrepancy between these diagnoses was found. No major discrepancies were found between the consultant's telecytologic and glass slide diagnoses. HUM PATHOL 32:1323-1326. This is a U.S. government work. There are no restrictions on its use.