Abstract

An understanding of factors influencing health in socioeconomic groups is required to reduce health inequalities. This study investigated combinations of health determinants associated with self-rated health (SRH), and their relative importance, in income-based groups.Cross-sectional data from year 15 (2000 − 2001) of the CARDIA study (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults, USA) - 3648 men and women (mean 40 years) - were split into 5 income-based groups. SRH responses were categorized as ‘higher’/‘lower’. Health determinants (medical, lifestyle, and social factors, living conditions) associated with SRH in each group were analyzed using classification tree analysis (CTA).Income and SRH were positively associated (p < 0.05). Data suggested an income-based gradient for lifestyle/medical/social factors/living conditions. Profiles, and relative importance ranking, of multi-domain health determinants, in relation to SRH, differed by income group. The highest ranking variable for each income group was chronic burden-personal health problem (<$25,000); physical activity ($25–50,000; $50–75,000; $100,000 +); and cigarettes/day ($75–100,000). In lower income groups, more risk factors and chronic burden indicators were associated with SRH. Social support, control over life, optimism, and resources for paying for basics/medical care/health insurance were greater (%) with higher income.SRH is a multidimensional measure; CTA is useful for contextualizing risk factors in relation to health status. Findings suggest that for lower income groups, addressing contributors to chronic burden is important alongside lifestyle/medical factors. In a proportionate universalism context, in addition to differences in intensity of public health action across the socioeconomic gradient, differences in the type of interventions to improve SRH may also be important.

Highlights

  • The socioeconomic gradient in health is well recognized

  • History of heart disease; medical conditions; all lifestyle factors; ability to rely on friends/family; and all chronic burden indicators were related to self-rated health (SRH) status

  • Consistent with previous studies, prevalence of higher SRH increased with higher income; there was an income gradient for several health determinants relating to lifestyle and medical factors, social and community influences, and living conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The socioeconomic gradient in health is well recognized. Knowledge of differences in characteristics associated with good or poor health in socioeconomic groups is important to inform appropriate interventions, and improve health status across the gradient. A solitary focus on single risk factors overlooks the combined impact of these multi-domain influences on health status (Marmot et al, 1998; Ostlin et al, 2005). The WHO Task Force on Research Priorities for Equity in Health called for research studying the “interrelationships between individual factors and social context that increase or decrease the likelihood of achieving and maintaining good health” (Ostlin et al, 2005)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call