Abstract

The 7-valent and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV7 and PCV13, respectively) are highly effective in preventing invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) caused by vaccine serotypes. Vaccine failure (vaccine-type IPD after age-appropriate immunization) is rare. Little is known about the risk, clinical characteristics, or outcomes of PCV13 compared to PCV7 vaccine failure. Public Health England conducts IPD surveillance and provides a national reference service for serotyping pneumococcal isolates in England and Wales. We compared the epidemiology, rates, risk factors, serotype distribution, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of IPD in children with PCV13 and PCV7 vaccine failure. A total of 163 episodes of PCV failure were confirmed in 161 children over 8 years (4 September 2006 to 3 September 2014) in 10 birth cohorts. After 3 vaccine doses, PCV7 and PCV13 failure rates were 0.19/100000 (95% confidence interval [CI], .10-.33 [57 cases]) and 0.66/100000 (95% CI, .44-.95 [104 cases]) vaccinated person-years, respectively. Children with PCV13 failure were more likely to be healthy (87/105 [82.9%] vs 37/56 [66.1%]; P = .02), present with bacteremic lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) (61/105 [58.1%] vs 11/56 [19.6%]; P < .001), and develop empyema (41/61 [67.2%] vs 1/11 [9.1%]; P < .001) compared to PCV7 failures. Serotypes 3 (n = 38 [36.2%]) and 19A (n = 30 [28.6%]) were responsible for most PCV13 failures. Six children died (4% [95% CI, 1%-8%]), including 5 with comorbidities. PCV failure is rare and, compared to PCV7 serotypes, the additional PCV13 serotypes are more likely to cause bacteremic LRTI and empyema in healthy vaccinated children.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.