Abstract

This paper gives an account of the similarities and differences between alternative and polar questions, where these question forms stand at the intersection of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. We contrastively examine the nature of alternative and polar yes-no questions. We characterise the forms of these question types and the functions they serve. We examine the semantic and pragmatic dimensions of each question form and their answers. We characterise the felicity conditions necessary for their successful realisation of the speech act of requesting information via the alternative and yes-no interrogatives and assume that information is freely exchanged under a Gricean presumption of cooperation. We show that alternative questions have some similarities, but also significant differences, to polar yes-no questions. Alternative questions do not allow for yes-no answers. Instead, an appropriate answer must contain one of a selection from the alternative choice options listed in the framing of the question. Alternative questions are dependent on the presence of disjunction. We characterise the syntax and semantics of polar yes-no questions. We demonstrate in respect of the answers to polar yes-no questions of Irish that they contain instances of ellipsis and are full clausal expressions with a complete semantics where the elided elements are from the question part of the question-answer pair. The propositional content of polar yes-no questions is inferred from the context, specifically from the question with which the answer is paired. Irish does not have any exact words which directly correspond to English ‘yes’ or ‘no’ and so employs different strategies where a yes-no answer is required.

Highlights

  • This paper1 compares and contrasts the syntactic forms of alternative questions with those of polar questions and how these question types differ in function, as instances of the speech act of requesting information

  • This paper gives an account of the differences between alternative and polar questions, where these question forms stand at the intersection of syntax, semantics, and pragmatics

  • We characterise the forms of these question types and the functions they serve, touching upon semantic and pragmatic dimensions of each question form and their answers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper compares and contrasts the syntactic forms of alternative questions with those of polar questions and how these question types differ in function, as instances of the speech act of requesting information. Functions, and pragmatics of alternate questions and polar yes-no interrogatives as question-answer pairs. Languages have different strategies for soliciting different kinds of information, and Irish is no different in this regard These questioning strategies require sentences with different structural forms to act as signalling cues for the various kinds of information required (Nolan 2019:105–136). We contrastively examine the nature of alternative and polar yes-no questions. We characterise the felicity conditions necessary for the successful realisation of the speech act of requesting information via the alternative and yes-no interrogatives, and assume that information is freely exchanged under a Gricean presumption of cooperation.

Context and the speech act of requesting information
The question particles
The alternative questions of Irish
The polar yes-no question as an interrogative sentence
Concluding discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call