Abstract

<p>A cold bias in the extratropical lowermost stratosphere in forecasts is one of the most prominent systematic temperature errors in numerical weather prediction models. Hypothesized causes of this bias include radiative effects from a collocated moist bias in model analyses. Such biases would be expected to affect extratropical dynamics and result in the misrepresentation of wave propagation at tropopause level. Here the extent to which these biases are connected is quantified. Observations from radiosondes are compared to operational analyses and forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) and Met Office Unified Model (MetUM) to determine the magnitude and vertical structure of these biases. Both operational models over-estimate lowermost stratospheric specific humidity by around 70% of the observed values on average, around 1km above the tropopause. This moist bias is already present in the initial conditions and changes little in forecasts over the first five days. Though temperatures are represented well in the analyses, the IFS forecasts anomalously cool in the lower stratosphere, relative to verifying radiosonde observations, by 0.2K per day. The IFS single column model is used to show this temperature change can be attributed to increased long-wave radiative cooling due to the lowermost stratospheric moist bias in the initial conditions. However, the MetUM temperature biases cannot be entirely attributed to the moist bias, and another significant factor must be present. These results highlight the importance of improving the humidity analysis to reduce the extratropical lowermost stratospheric cold bias in forecast models and the need to understand and mitigate the causes of the moist bias in these models.</p>

Highlights

  • The representation of specific humidity near the tropopause in numerical models has been shown to be important for the accuracy of medium-range forecasts and climate integrations

  • Observations from radiosondes are compared to operational analyses and forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) and Met Office Unified Model (MetUM) to determine the magnitude and vertical structure of these biases

  • By comparing data from radiosondes released at 1200 UTC to those released at 0000 UTC in our dataset, we find that the RS41 radiosondes exhibit negligible day/night differences, but that the RS92 radiosondes report slightly higher humidity during the day, with the difference being everywhere less than 3% of the mean specific humidity value in the troposphere, and less than 5% in the stratosphere

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The representation of specific humidity near the tropopause in numerical models has been shown to be important for the accuracy of medium-range forecasts and climate integrations. Modelling studies have demonstrated that both stratospheric and tropospheric temperatures in climate models are sensitive to stratospheric water vapour (Smith et al, 2001; Solomon et al, 2010). Many of these studies have been motivated by an observed trend of increasing stratospheric water vapour in the late 20th century, and show that this results in enhanced cooling of the lower stratosphere (Forster and Shine, 1999; Maycock et al, 2011). By increasing stratospheric water vapour in general circulation models (Joshi et al, 2006; Maycock et al, 2013) or imposing stratospheric cooling to mimic the temperature response to increased stratospheric water vapour (Tandon et al, 2011), it has been shown that such changes can lead to a poleward shift in the jets and storm tracks, a strengthening of the jets and other changes to the atmospheric circulation in models. The aim of this paper is to characterise lowermost stratosphere humidity biases in atmospheric analyses and their impact on temperature biases in numerical weather prediction forecasts

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call