Abstract

Cellulosic materials have special advantages for transport packaging, because of their light-weight and recyclable natures and also relatively high specific strength. The strength of such materials is normally evaluated by applying monotonically increasing, quasi-static displacement (or load). However, in real circumstances, the material is subjected to far more complex loading histories, such as creep, fatigue, and random loading. Failures under such circumstances are, not only time-dependent, but also notoriously variable. For example, the coefficient of variation for creep lifetime reaches or even exceeds 100%. The objective of this study is to develop a method to characterise both time-dependent and statistical natures of failures of cellulosic materials. We have used a general formulation of time-dependent, statistical failure, originally proposed by Coleman (J Appl Phys 29(6):968–983, 1958). We have identified three material parameters: (1) characteristic strength, representing short term strength, (2) brittleness parameter (or durability), and (3) Weibull shape parameter related to long-term reliability. These parameters were determined by special protocols of creep and constant loading-rate (CLR) tests for a series of containerboards. Results have shown that these two test methods yield comparable values for the materials parameters. This implies the possibility of replacing extremely time-consuming creep tests with the more time-efficient CLR tests. Comparing the cellulose fibre networks with fibres and composites used for advanced structural applications, we have found that they are very competitive in both reliability and durability aspects with Kevlar and glass-fibre composites.Graphical abstract

Highlights

  • Material strength is traditionally evaluated by critical stress at which the material fails under monotonically increasing displacement conditions

  • In order to illustrate the nature of statistical failure, we have performed creep and constant loading rate (CLR) tests in compression by using the same fluting material randomly chosen

  • The aspects of time-dependent, statistical failures, which are commonly seen in fatigue, creep failure, or, more generally, end-use failures of structural members, are still poorly understood

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Material strength is traditionally evaluated by critical stress at which the material fails under monotonically increasing displacement (or load) conditions. Creep strength, as measured by time-tocollapse (lifetime), showed the opposite: Box A had a longer lifetime than Box B (Fig. 1a). Box A is more durable than Box B, even though the ‘‘ordinary’’ strength is lower. This poses a fundamental question of the relevance of typical static strength to longer-term strength properties. Another important aspect of long-term performance is variability. The variations of lifetimes among the boxes were extremely large, and the coefficient of variation (COV) varied from 34 to 77% for the different load levels, the measurements were done under a nominally constant environmental condition

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call