Abstract

Introduction There is no diagnosis for phantom limb pain (PLP), and its investigation is based on anamnesis, which is subject to several biases. Therefore, it is important to describe and standardize the diagnostic methodology for PLP. Objective To characterise PLP and, secondarily, to determine predictors for its diagnosis. Methodology. This is a cross-sectional study involving patients with unilateral traumatic lower-limb amputation aged over 18 years. Those with clinical decompensation or evidence of disease, trauma, or surgery in the central or peripheral nervous system were excluded. Sociodemographic and rehabilitative data were collected; PLP was characterised using the visual analogue scale (VAS), pain descriptors, and weekly frequency. Results A total of 55 eligible patients participated in the study; most were male, young, above-knee amputees in the preprosthetic phase of the rehabilitation. The median PLP VAS was 60 (50–79.3) mm characterised by 13 (6–20) different descriptors in the same patient, which coexist, alternate, and add up to a frequency of 3.94 (2.5–4.38) times per week. The most frequent descriptor was movement of the phantom limb (70.91%). Tingling, numbness, flushing, itchiness, spasm, tremor, and throbbing are statistically significant PLP descriptor numbers per patient predicted by above-knee amputation, prosthetic phase, higher education level, and greater PLP intensity by VAS (p < 0.05). Conclusion PLP is not a single symptom, but a set with different sensations and perceptions that need directed and guided anamnesis for proper diagnosis.

Highlights

  • Amputation causes a physical disability, and visually diagnosed, with immediate effects on functionality

  • Characterisation through the questionnaire showed that phantom limb pain (PLP) is not a single painful symptom, but a set of symptoms for which patients have difficulty finding words to describe

  • Confounders that could interfere in afferences in the processing and interpretation of the central nervous system as well as in the efferent responses were excluded. is allowed for a better understanding of the symptomatology related exclusively to PLP since the current evidence of its origin is associated with neurogenic processes [11, 12]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Amputation causes a physical disability, and visually diagnosed, with immediate effects on functionality. As an immediate effect on mobility, the amputee experiences pain in the residual limb and in the amputated part. Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a pain in the missing part, defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as any sensation, movement, or posture; voluntary or involuntary; and perceived in the patient’s missing body part and described as unpleasant. It excludes RLP and phantom limb sensations related to the nonunpleasant perception of the amputated (missing) part [3,4,5]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call