Abstract

Much discussion surrounds the flight of association footballs (soccer balls), particularly where the flight may be perceived as irregular. This is particularly prevalent in high-profile competitions due to increased camera coverage and public scrutiny. All footballs do not perform in an identical manner in flight. This article develops methods to characterise the important features of flight, enabling direct, quantitative comparisons between ball designs. The system used to generate the flight paths included collection of aerodynamic force coefficient data in a wind tunnel, which were input into a flight model across a wide range of realistic conditions. Parameters were derived from these trajectories to characterise the in-flight deviations across the range of flights from which the aerodynamic performance of different balls were statistically compared. The amount of lateral movement in flight was determined by calculating the final lateral deviation from the initial shot vector. To quantify the overall shape of the flight, increasing orders of polynomial functions were fitted to the flight path until a good fit was obtained with a high-order polynomial indicating a less consistent flight. The number of inflection points in each flight was also recorded to further define the flight path. The orientation dependency of a ball was assessed by comparing the true shot to a second flight path without considering orientation-dependent forces. The difference between these flights isolated the effect of orientation-dependent aerodynamic forces. The article provides the means of quantitatively describing a ball’s aerodynamic behaviour in a defined and robust mathematical process. Conclusions were not drawn regarding which balls are good and bad; these are subjective terms and can only be analysed through comprehensive player perception studies.

Highlights

  • Association football is the most viewed and played sport in the world

  • All footballs do not perform in an identical manner; for example, Passmore et al.[1] measured considerable variation in aerodynamic loads for a range of Federation Internationale de Football Association (FIFA)-approved footballs that will lead to differences between flight paths

  • While standards exist for controlling the performance of footballs with regards to circumference, sphericity, rebound, water absorption, weight, and pressure loss,[2] standards do not exist for the flight, nor are there accepted methods to quantify or characterise aerodynamic performance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Association football (soccer) is the most viewed and played sport in the world. Having a satisfactory ball design is of great importance, in highprofile competitions. Analysis of the aerodynamics of smooth and rough spheres was completed by Achenbach[4,5] and is widely used for comparison against various sports balls. Achenbach presented data on the flow separation in each of these regimes that can be used to explain the flow’s behaviour and measured aerodynamic loading on the sphere. Achenbach[4] showed that by adding roughness to the sphere surface, one can control the critical Reynolds number (Recrit), and the aerodynamic behaviour of the ball in the expected range of airspeeds. Passmore et al.[1,3] present a comprehensive, wind-tunnel-based analysis of the aerodynamics of footballs and how the features of the ball can affect the measured aerodynamic forces and a prediction of how this can alter the flight path a ball might take. Their article includes a summary of much of the existing work in the field and is not repeated here

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call