Abstract

BackgroundChronic systemic inflammation has been associated with incident dementia, but its association with age-related cognitive decline is less clear. The acute responses of many inflammatory biomarkers mean they may provide an unreliable picture of the chronicity of inflammation. Recently, a large-scale epigenome-wide association study identified DNA methylation correlates of C-reactive protein (CRP)—a widely used acute-phase inflammatory biomarker. DNA methylation is thought to be relatively stable in the short term, marking it as a potentially useful signature of exposure.MethodsWe utilise a DNA methylation-based score for CRP and investigate its trajectories with age, and associations with cognitive ability in comparison with serum CRP and a genetic CRP score in a longitudinal study of older adults (n = 889) and a large, cross-sectional cohort (n = 7028).ResultsWe identified no homogeneous trajectories of serum CRP with age across the cohorts, whereas the epigenetic CRP score was consistently found to increase with age (standardised β = 0.07 and 0.01) and to do so more rapidly in males compared to females. Additionally, the epigenetic CRP score had higher test-retest reliability compared to serum CRP, indicating its enhanced temporal stability. Higher serum CRP was not found to be associated with poorer cognitive ability (standardised β = − 0.08 and − 0.05); however, a consistent negative association was identified between cognitive ability and the epigenetic CRP score in both cohorts (standardised β = − 0.15 and − 0.08).ConclusionsAn epigenetic proxy of CRP may provide a more reliable signature of chronic inflammation, allowing for more accurate stratification of individuals, and thus clearer inference of associations with incident health outcomes.

Highlights

  • Chronic systemic inflammation has been associated with incident dementia, but its association with age-related cognitive decline is less clear

  • Correlation between serum C-reactive protein (CRP), DNA methylation (DNAm) CRP score, and genetic score In both cohorts, the Pearson correlations between the DNAm CRP score and serum log(CRP) were moderate (LBC1936: r = 0.34, 95% CI [0.28, 0.4]; Generation Scotland (GS): r = 0.28 [0.19, 0.36]), with the DNAm CRP score showing a stronger correlation with serum CRP than any one of its composite CpGs in both cohorts

  • The correlation between the DNAm CRP score and the genetic score was low in Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (LBC1936) (r = 0.07 [0.06, 0.14]) and not significantly different to zero in GS (r = − 0.01 [− 0.03, 0.016])

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chronic systemic inflammation has been associated with incident dementia, but its association with age-related cognitive decline is less clear. A large-scale epigenome-wide association study identified DNA methylation correlates of C-reactive protein (CRP)—a widely used acute-phase inflammatory biomarker. Epidemiological studies have associated ageing with a progressive shift to a chronic inflammatory state This low-grade, typically sub-acute, elevation of peripheral pro-inflammatory mediators in the absence of overt infection is strongly associated with the susceptibility to, and progression of, many age-associated diseases and is a key risk factor for mortality [4,5,6]. Accumulating evidence has implicated chronic inflammation with incident dementia, but the association with pre-morbid cognitive function is less firmly defined and has generated considerable debate [7]. Evidence from large, prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies has been largely mixed, with positive, negative, and null associations identified between serum inflammatory biomarker levels and cognitive ability [8,9,10,11,12]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.