Abstract

The current study is an attempt to demonstrate how characters are represented in Sinan Antoon’s Self-translated novel ‘The Corpse Washer’. The study adopts a Critical Discourse Analysis framework to analyse major characters' utterances through the use of van Leeuwen's socio-semantic Model ‘Social Actor Representation’. The linguistic analysis of characters' utterances aims at analysing the active and passive representation within the novel as well as the character’s importance by tracking the frequency of representation. The main aim of this study is to check the applicability of Social actor representation to literary social actors within novels since previous studies used this model to analyse non-fictional social actors. The result shows that the characters are included more than excluded and activated more than passivated due to the characters of the novel. Moreover, the chosen model for this study shows its effectiveness in analysing the selected data.

Highlights

  • Discourse analysis is major field in linguistics since it was first introduced by Zeling Harris in 1952 (Paltridge 2012:2)

  • Discourse analysis is defined in terms of two paradigms: structure and function

  • Social Actor Representation (SAR) network analyzes social actor ( SA) according to a number of categories, but due to the paper limitation this paper focus on activation and passivation applied in “The Corpse Washer”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Discourse analysis is major field in linguistics since it was first introduced by Zeling Harris in 1952 (Paltridge 2012:2). Discourse analysis is defined in terms of two paradigms: structure and function. Foucault and Sheridan (1972:79) introduce a different perspective of ‘discourse’ as they point out to the concept of knowledge or ‘episteme’. They believe that 'discourse' is not a piece of text, but a “practice that systematically form the objects of which they speak”. Discourse affects how ideas are put into practice and can regulate the www.psychologyandeducation.net interpretation of others. This indicates that discourse exercises limitations and restrictions on the ways of talking and producing knowledge about it

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call