Abstract
As Gibbon once famously remarked, the surprising thing about the Roman Empire is not its fall, but rather its remarkable longevity. This very durability may well have led to the comparative silence that we find in our contemporary sources concerning the nature and intentions of Roman Imperialism as those living under the Empire in the main simply took Roman rule for granted: it was assumed to be an unchanging and unchangeable constant of their lives and as such no more worthy of comment than the weather. Kipling outlined a moral 'White Man's burden' and Pliny would have both recognised and assented to this version of the Imperial dream. This approach continued into the late Roman period where the notion of Rome's civilising mission was appropriated by Christian apologists such as Augustine and Orosius, whence it has had an important impact on later imperialist thought. Keywords: Roman Empire; Roman Imperialism; White Man's burden
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
