Abstract
Bilingualism and other factors make Giordano Bruno a safe bet for many academics of today: publishing work on Bruno can be a valid title for the career of a scholar of Italian literature or of the history of Italian language, or for that of a student of neo-Latin culture, for specialists in theatre, the history of science, the history of philosophy and so forth. Bruno was familiar with Paracelsian magic, his alchemy and especially his theory of medicine. He was himself certainly one of the most important representatives of the Lullian tradition in the Renaissance, points first to the commentaries of Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim and then to Jacques Lefevre and Charles de Bovelles. In the tradition of the philosophy of love and the commentaries on the Song of Songs, a tradition very near to mystical literature, these Lullian masterpieces hold the place of honour.Keywords: Charles de Bovelles; Giordano Bruno; Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa von Nettesheim; Jacques Lefevre; Lullian tradition; neo-Latin culture; Paracelsian magic
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
