Abstract
This chapter discusses stimulus combination in nonhuman primates. Experiments with animals have been concerned either with learning or with selective attention, and these studies have generally been presented in a few simple paradigms. The three stimulus combination experiments described in this chapter add to the data that are difficult to explain with Sutherland and Mackintosh's selective attention model. Most other data with monkeys likewise do not confirm the attention model predictions, so one possibility is that there are species differences in the model and another is that the selective attention model needs some modification before it can be applied to nonhuman primates. One of the experiments supporting the selective attention position is stimulus-compounding experiment. It was reasoned that the negative correlation between learning to discriminate orientation and brightness after confounded training was evidence of learning of switch-in analyzers. If a particular animal had a response bias and the model was sampled until finding an element corresponding to his expectancy, the response probability would be negatively correlated for the two sets of stimuli. Although there was no provision in sampling model for more than one pair of training stimuli and no mechanism for combining stimuli, it might be a bit more parsimonious to begin with a simple performance model than to postulate complex analyzers, which are switched in and out.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.