Abstract

Today no law enforcement agency in the world would think of carrying on investigations without using photography, fingerprint technology, or DNA evidence testing. Yet, each one of these disciplines took years to become accepted as necessary investigative tools. This chapter describes reasons for the scarcity of forensic art. It is noted that the forensic artists themselves are fragmented in their attitudes about their own profession. There is even doubt at this early stage that law enforcement agencies are able to allocate funds for forensic artists. Law enforcement leaders should decide the logical, correct thing to do is fund forensic artists to help their victims of crime find justice. To propel the forensic art profession, members should quantify results and portray a positive image of the discipline in words and actions. It is recommended to prepare a presentation and explain how forensic images can help identify criminals to local groups. Forensic art is in the beginning stages; utilization should vastly increase for the sake of justice. A forensic artist should sketch with any witness to a crime who saw the perpetrator's face if detectives are serious about investigating the case. Further, maintenance of forensic sketch files in anticipation of court testimony, dressing appropriately for court, and familiarization of oneself with the standard questions asked in court are recommended.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call