Abstract
Extended producer responsibility was characterized as an economic incentive to reduce waste, which is applied through product life-cycle thinking. It permeates environmental legislation, and, in particular, electronics recycling-related legislation, in many different ways. The allocation of responsibilities has often proved to be the most controversial point in drafting recycling policies. A gamut of opinions regarding the proper division of responsibilities may also be found within the stakeholder groups. The trade implications of allocating the actual and financial recycling responsibilities thus merit further elaboration. Extended producer responsibility in the field of solid waste management is often divided into a functional and financial element. One of the environmental guidelines underlying extended producer responsibility is the pays principle. A requirement of a collective financial responsibility would therefore lead to a lower degree of environmental protection and a higher likelihood of trade impediments. Finally, differences between individual and collective financial responsibility are discussed.Keywords: collective financial responsibility; environmental legislation; extended producer responsibility; financial recycling responsibilities; individual financial responsibility; polluter pays principle; stakeholder groups
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.