Abstract

Precise assessment of the in situ pore size distribution is critical for successful reservoir development. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) T2 distribution logging enables the in situ estimations of reservoir pore size, fluid mobility, and fluid composition. However, the NMR logs are not acquired in all the wells due to operational or financial constraints. In this study, we compare the performance of shallow-learning and deep-learning models in synthesizing the NMR T2 distribution logs. Six shallow-learning models and four deep-learning models are trained and tested on data acquired from a 300-ft depth interval of a shale formation. Both raw “easy-to-acquire” conventional well logs and the inverted formation mineral and fluid composition logs are used for the synthesis of the NMR T2 distribution logs. Deep-learning models perform better than shallow-learning models. We implement a two-step training process to boost the performance of the deep-learning models. Deep-learning models have better performance when trained with inverted logs as compared that with raw logs.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.