Abstract

International humanitarian law (IHL) is based and has the potential to alter fundamentally the perceptions of the law of armed conflict. The paper addresses this development in the context of the dehumanization of IHL. It retraces the history of autonomous weapons and differentiates future generations of autonomous weapon systems (AWS) from the current generation of weapons. The paper addresses the potential effect of AWS with respect to two cornerstones of IHL: the principle of distinction and the principle of proportionality. It argues that from a legal perspective, AWS can be employed only in the rarest of circumstances in light of the legal constraints inherent in these two principles. Thus, their potential deployment is limited to such an extent as to render them useless. Keywords:autonomous weapon systems (AWS); International humanitarian law (IHL); law of armed conflict; principle of distinction; principle of proportionality

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.