Abstract
The criteria for demonstrating the efficacy of red cell substitutes has been a problem from the beginning of research on these materials. This problem derives, in large part, from the fact that red cells, per se, have never been subjected to a controlled clinical trial for the purpose of demonstrating their efficacy. There is, therefore, no standard to compare red cell substitutes. The paucity of fundamental research in the area of oxygen transport does not support the use of laboratory assays as definitive endpoints. The problem of demonstrating efficacy is on the minds of investigators from the outset. It is a special problem with red cell substitutes because the criteria for transfusing red cells constitute a subject that itself is mired in controversy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Blood Substitutes, Present and Future Perspectives
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.