Abstract

This chapter will explore the importance of different political orientations in developing regulatory frameworks for biofuels in the context of competing or complementary uses for land resources, food and energy demand, and their significance for climate change mitigation. The argument is made that different countries, with different environmental resource endowments, face very different food–energy–climate change trilemmas, as a consequence of which, they respond in contrasting ways to tensions around land use, food and energy security. To substantiate this argument, the chapter compares the development of regulatory policies to biofuels in Germany, India, China and Brazil, and the “political instituting” of biofuel markets in those countries. Major geopolitical shifts in relation to oil-price volatility, food price spikes and sustainability crises have recently resulted in a widespread negative regulatory turn to biofuel development, but with contrasting perspectives in the different cases.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.