Changing Trends in Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Bloodstream Infection (BSI) in Secondary Care Hospitals of India.

Abstract

Introduction Bloodstream infection (BSI) and subsequent sepsis are life-threatening medical conditions. The onset of antimicrobial resistance and subsequent multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) significantly increase healthcare-associated expenditure with adverse clinical outcomes. The present study was undertaken to identify the trends of BSI in community settings in secondary care hospitals (smaller private hospitals and district hospitals) in the state of Madhya Pradeshin Central India with the support of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and National Health Mission, Madhya Pradesh. Methodology The present study was a prospective, longitudinal observational chart review type of study. The study was carried out at 10 secondary care hospitals (eight smaller private hospitals and two government district hospitals) nominated by the State Government as part of the ICMR Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance and Research Network (AMRSN). The hospitals were nominated depending on the availability of a microbiology laboratory and a full-time microbiologist. Result A total of 6202 blood samples were received from patients with suspected BSI, out of which 693 samples were positive for aerobic culture. Among these, 621 (89.6%) showed bacterial growth and 72 (10.3%) grew Candida species (spp). Out of the 621 bacterial growth samples, Gram-negative bacteria were 406 (65.3%) and Gram-positive bacteria were 215 (34.6%). Among the Gram-negative isolates (406), the predominant isolate was Escherichia coli (115; 28.3%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae(109; 26.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa(61; 15%), Salmonella spp. (52; 12.8%), Acinetobacter spp. (47; 11.6%) and the other Enterobacter spp. (22; 5.4%). Among the Gram-positive isolates (215), the predominant isolate was Staphylococcus aureus(178; 82.8%) followed by Enterococcus spp. (37; 17.2%). Among the Escherichia coli, third-generation cephalosporin resistance was identified in 77.6%, piperacillin-tazobactam resistance in 45.2%, carbapenem resistance in 23.5% and colistin resistance in 16.5% of cases. Among the Klebsiella pneumoniae, third-generation cephalosporin resistance was identified in 80.7%, piperacillin-tazobactam resistance in 72.8%, carbapenem resistance in 63.3% and colistin resistance in 14% of cases. Among the Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ceftazidime resistance was identified in 61.2%, piperacillin-tazobactam resistance in 55%, carbapenem resistance in 32.8%, and colistin resistance in 38.3% of cases. Among the Acinetobacter spp., piperacillin-tazobactam resistance was identified in 72.7%, carbapenem resistance in 72.3%, and colistin resistance in 9.3% cases. While analyzing the antibiogram for Staphylococcus aureus isolates, methicillin resistance (MRSA) was seen in 70.3% of cases, followed by vancomycin resistance (VRSA) in 8% of cases and linezolid resistance in 8.1%. Among the Enterococcus spp. isolates, linezolid resistance was found in 13.5%, vancomycin resistance (VRE) in 21.6%, and teicoplanin resistance in 29.7% of cases. Conclusion In conclusion, the first-ever study to identify the risk of high-end antibiotics causing significant drug resistance in secondary and tertiary care settings has highlighted the urgent need for more randomized control studies and proactive measures from healthcare authorities and serves as a beacon for future research efforts and underscores the importance of implementing antibiograms to combat the growing threat of antibiotic resistance.