Abstract

Today’s landowners are faced with important decisions when establishing loblolly pine plantations in the Southeastern part of the United States with regards to planting dimensions and forest management techniques. Although recent studies are beginning to demonstrate the need for change from the old practices, suppressed biomass markets and prices are hindering the transition. This paper provided readers with an informational overview of the benefits of: incorporating an additional thinning regime for biomass, using alternate spacing methods such as FlexstandsTM and rectangularity, and using small-scale harvesting machines for conducting initial thinning’s. The overview was supported with both a field study as well as a modeling tool which verified using one or all of the above-mentioned techniques to increase total harvest volumes while minimizing residual stand damage. The modeling tool determined that final sawtimber volumes were increased by a minimum of 15 tons per acre using one or more of the above techniques. When expanding this volume out to 20 acres, the minimum tract size harvested in the southeast using convention equipment, landowners could easily recover any losses incurred from the suppressed biomass markets minimizing overall risk and promoting the use of these alternative techniques.

Highlights

  • Forest landowners in the southeastern part of the United States are faced with multiple challenges when it comes to harvesting loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L) from their land

  • A final weight for Stand 1 was calculated at 84,690 pounds or 42.35 green tons that were removed from a one-acre tract

  • When market prices increase for woody biomass in the southeastern part of the United States, FlexStandsTM will be a viable option for landowners to increase their revenue

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forest landowners in the southeastern part of the United States are faced with multiple challenges when it comes to harvesting loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L) from their land. Tract sizes are shrinking as lands become more fragmentized making it hard for landowners to find loggers willing to harvest their land (Daniel, 2012; Aguilar et al, 2014; Butler and Butler, 2016a). Promoting Sawtimber Using Alternative Techniques possible to mitigate the risk of such a long-term investment and incentivize them to re-establish the land back into timber rather than convert it to another use that provides greater financial or intrinsic value for them (Butler and Leatherberry, 2004; Butler, 2008; Aguilar et al, 2013). With all the above mentioned challenges, it becomes confusing for a landowner when trying to decide how to establish and manage their loblolly pine plantation. The overview was supported with both a field study as well as a modeling tool which verified using one or all of the above mentioned techniques to increase total harvest volumes while minimizing residual stand damage

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call