Abstract

Climate change is likely to impact precipitation as well as snow accumulation and melt in the Northeastern and Upper Midwest United States, ultimately affecting the quantity and seasonal distribution of streamflow. The objective of this study is to analyze seasonality of long-term daily annual maximum streamflow (AMF) records and its changes for 158 sites in Northeastern and Upper Midwest Unites States. A comprehensive circular statistical approach comprising a kernel density method was used to assess the seasonality of AMF. Temporal changes were analyzed by separating the AMF records into two 30-year sub-periods (1951–1980 and 1981–2010). Results for temporal change in seasonality showed mixed pattern/trend across the stations. While for majority of stations, the distribution of AMF timing is strongly unimodal (concentrated around spring season) for the period 1951–1980, the seasonal modes have weakened during the period 1981–2010 for several stations along the coastal region with simultaneous emergence of multiple modes indicating changes of seasonality therein. The fresh statistical approach based on non-parametric circular density estimates reduces some of the limitations of previous studies to detect and model event timing distributions with multiple seasons and addresses issues of non-stationarity in the data records of extreme events.

Highlights

  • Floods have generally been recognized as a stationary, independent and identically distributed random process by hydrologists [1]

  • For the circular statistical method, calendar dates of annual maximum streamflow (AMF) were converted to Julian dates (D), where D = 1 for January

  • This study builds on earlier studies by providing a detailed assessment of seasonality of daily annual maximum streamflow (AMF) events for the Northeastern and Upper Midwest United States

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Floods have generally been recognized as a stationary, independent and identically distributed random process by hydrologists [1]. Result in: (i) increases or decreases in streamflow magnitudes and frequency [5]; (ii) changes in the timing of streamflow [6]. Numerous studies have examined temporal trends in streamflow magnitude and frequency across the continental United States [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Most of these studies have summarized that a significant change has been detected in low to moderate streamflow in many regions, while change in highflows are less significant [13,14]. While the magnitude and frequency of flood events is a primary concern for the sizing of stormwater sewers, flood protection, and other drainage appurtenances, it is the timing

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.