Abstract

In contrast to state-religion systems of separation, many European states have a confession-based policy on religion. This describes the relationship of the state to one or more preferred state-recognised religious confessions. State recognition, or preferential treatment of the chosen religious confessions, can occur in many variations. These preferred confessions are predominantly the (former) Christian state churches. Such policies date from a period when Christian state churches involved a major part of the population. In view of changing religious landscapes, traditional confession-based policies have developed an exclusive character. These policies include only chosen declining religious groups, while they exclude groups that have gained social relevance. Notwithstanding the new situation, many governments have hitherto failed to address the need for the adjustment of their policies on religion. Unadjusted policies are unsuitable to deal creatively with religious diversity in today’s society. Governments that treat religious communities differently come into conflict with state neutrality and religious peace. This article opens the door to a six-part study, arguing that confession-based state policies on religion should incline towards greater inclusiveness. It is in the state’s best interest to mobilise the positive potential of all religious-sociological groups. This article specifically focuses on the changes that are becoming apparent in today’s religious landscapes and how these changes challenge traditional confession-based policies. It lays the foundation for the subsequent articles as a case study and a new conceptual framework for a fair, progressive and peacebuilding policy on religion for the Swiss Canton Bern.

Highlights

  • Traditional confession-based state policies on religion are reaching their limitsTraditional confession-based state policies on religion reflect the fact that a state has a relationship with one or more preferred confessional groups to which it grants privileges (Portier 2017:212)

  • In the Swiss Canton Bern, for example if people are not members of state-recognised religious communities, they are automatically categorised in the non-denominational group

  • If governments do not develop policies towards greater inclusiveness, unadjusted confession-based policies will continue to express an exclusive relationship between the state and one or more chosen religious groups, while these selected groups will sooner or later turn into social minorities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Traditional confession-based state policies on religion are reaching their limits. Traditional confession-based state policies on religion reflect the fact that a state has a relationship with one or more preferred confessional groups to which it grants privileges (Portier 2017:212). Confession-based policies, which have a long tradition in the European context, exclude churches and religious communities beyond those that have been recognised by the state. While confession-based policies played a comprehensive role for decades, because they included the majority population, these policies have today lost their inclusive character They do not consider new sociological groups of the religious landscape, namely churches and religious communities unrecognised by the state, and the nondenominational part of the population. In the Swiss Canton Bern, for example if people are not members of state-recognised religious communities, they are automatically categorised in the non-denominational group. The immigration of people from a variety of Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist and other religious backgrounds has increased religious diversity, both interreligious diversity and Christian-ecumenical diversity

Key findings
Conclusion
Findings
Data availability statement

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.