Abstract
We advance theory on CEO succession by examining the effects of strategic leadership transitions coupled with change in political ideology—i.e., when a conservative CEO is replaced by a liberal, or vice-versa. Drawing on the organizational-disruption theory of succession, we postulate that value-related ideological differences between the new CEO and the predecessor amplify succession-related disruption and increase the likelihood of new CEO early departure. We further conjecture that the effect of shifting CEO ideology on successor’s early departure strengthens when (a) the predecessor remains board chair after succession, (b) the new CEO ideologically misfits the incumbent executive group, and (c) the shift in CEO ideology occurs under conditions of poor pre-succession firm performance and low industry munificence. Survival analyses of 1,699 CEO succession events in S&P 1500 firms support our predictions. Based upon our findings, we offer a mid-range theory on the disruptive nature of shifting CEO ideology in strategic leadership, and highlight a set of parameters that organizations should consider in the CEO succession process.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
