Abstract

The ground nesting raptor Montagu’s Harrier breeds in loose colonies in cereal fields in the Spanish Extremadura. It is unclear how and whether birds in different colonies interact and how harriers spend time before and after nesting, before starting migration. We used GPS–GSM tags deployed on ten females and three males, some over multiple seasons, to follow bird movements with unprecedented detail. Arriving from spring migration, all males and most females returned to their old nest site, and spent between 13 and 25 days in mate choice and local site inspection. During incubation and early nesting female movements were strongly reduced, but increased significantly during late nesting and post-fledging periods. After fledging or after breeding failure, females increased their flying radius. Some of them visited other colonies, for single days or for longer periods, or flew long distances within Spain. These visits might have included help in breeding attempts of other pairs (adoptions). Four out of six females returned to their own breeding site before starting migration. Several females repeatedly used common roosts in this phase. Non-breeding females were active in defending nests in the colony against predators. Females with successful brood initiated migration earlier and spent less time in Spain than non-breeders or those with predated nests. Unlike females, daily distances in males were more uniform. While all males remained in the breeding area for the entire season, their activity centres shifted more within that area than those of females.

Highlights

  • Much emphasis has been placed on studying the relationship between breeding and non-breeding movements, for migratory species, and comparing needs during migration and wintering vs breeding areas (Berthold 2001)

  • Tracking technologies have facilitated understanding movement patterns of individual birds. Both satellite tracking based on the Argos system and GPS-tracking technology (Global Positioning System) have revolutionised the study of animal movements (Trierweiler et al 2007; Bridge et al 2011; Limiñana et al 2012b; Klaassen et al 2014; Bouten et al 2013; Kays et al 2015)

  • Thanks to the GPS–GSM tags, we could follow the movements of 10 females (16 partial or complete seasons), and 3 males (6 partial or complete seasons) in detail (Table 1, Supplementary Table S1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Much emphasis has been placed on studying the relationship between breeding and non-breeding movements, for migratory species, and comparing needs during migration and wintering vs breeding areas (Berthold 2001). Tracking technologies have facilitated understanding movement patterns of individual birds. Both satellite tracking based on the Argos system (http://www.argos-system.org/) and GPS-tracking technology (Global Positioning System) have revolutionised the study of animal movements (Trierweiler et al 2007; Bridge et al 2011; Limiñana et al 2012b; Klaassen et al 2014; Bouten et al 2013; Kays et al 2015). The new satellite technology ICARUS (International Cooperation for Animal Research Using Space) will increase the resources in telemetry (Wikelski et al 2007)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call