Abstract
The notion of an object is changing by being taken small steps. Although, there is an ambiguity whether ‘data’ is an object or not under the law of armed conflict, the qualification of it will be discussed from different perspectives in this article. While the lex lata position does not accept data as an object by the impact of textual interpretation, the lex ferenda position approaches differently and regards data as an ‘object’ by taking teleological interpretation into consideration. As a last point of view, it will be demonstrated that state practice seems to progress towards the latter approach by giving examples from official documents prepared by states and international organisations. At this point, it will be demonstrated in this article that data is not an object, but it evolves towards being accepted as an object.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
