Abstract

INTRODUCTIONA total of 17 cases of penetrating neck injury were managed by the otolaryngology team at King’s College Hospital over a 3-year period in the 1980s. In April 2010 King’s College Hospital became the major trauma centre for South East London. This prospective cohort study compares the incidence, changing demographic features and treatment outcomes of penetrating neck trauma in South East London over the previous 23 years.METHODSData were collected over a 12-month period (April 2010 to March 2011) and a selective management protocol was introduced to standardise initial investigations and further treatment.RESULTSThe past 23 years have seen a 550% increase in the incidence of penetrating neck injuries in South East London, with a marked increase in gun crime. Only 38% of cases underwent negative neck exploration in 2011 compared with 65% in 1987. Selective conservative management based on the absence of haemodynamic instability or radiological findings reduces length of hospital stay, lightens surgical workload and cuts costs without affecting morbidity or mortality.CONCLUSIONSThe increased incidence of penetrating neck injury is a reflection of more interpersonal violence rather than a consequence of the larger South East London trauma centre catchment area. Tackling this problem requires focus on wider issues of community prevention. Sharing of data between the four London trauma centres and the police is needed to help prevent interpersonal violence and develop a universal treatment algorithm for other institutions to follow.

Highlights

  • KVU VTCFKVKQPCN ECVEJOGPV CTGC 6JKU KPENWFGU UQOG QH VJG OQUV FGRTKXGF CPF GVJPKECNN[ FKXGTUG DQTQWIJU KP VJG 7-.

  • %JCPIKPI KPEKFGPEG CPF OCPCIGOGPV QH RGPGVTCVKPI PGEM KPLWTKGU KP VJG 5QWVJ 'CUV .QPFQP VTCWOC EGPVTG

  • .GIGTYQQF GV CN KP CPF 0CTTQF CPF /QQTG KP UJQYGF VJCV VJG CDUGPEG QH JCTF ENKPKECN UKIPU QH JCGOQF[ PCOKE KPUVCDKNKV[ KP RGPGVTCVKPI NKOD KPLWT[ CEEWTCVGN[ GZ ENWFGF CTVGTKCN KPLWTKGU PGGFKPI UWTIKECN TGRCKT 'ZVTCRQNC VKQP QH VJKU ƂPFKPI KPVQ JGCF CPF PGEM VTGCVOGPV CNIQTKVJOU YCU FGNC[GF DGECWUG QH EQPEGTP VJCV OKUUGF KPLWTKGU EQWNF TGUWNV KP NKHG VJTGCVGPKPI UVTQMG

Read more

Summary

Introduction

KVU VTCFKVKQPCN ECVEJOGPV CTGC 6JKU KPENWFGU UQOG QH VJG OQUV FGRTKXGF CPF GVJPKECNN[ FKXGTUG DQTQWIJU KP VJG 7-.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.