Abstract

This article tries to make the German experience with large-scale systemic reform fruitful for an American audience. The effect of state policies in the areas of tracking, content, and pedagogy on the faculties of eight secondary schools is investigated Teachers forcefully adjusted beliefs to the new tracking structure, but not necessarily teaching standards. Teachers remained committed to canonical views of subject matter despite the recent dismantling of old "truths." Strong, but less desired, change in textbooks and content contrasts with weak, but more desired, change in instructional methods. Policy responses are interpreted with three frames of reference (institution, self, teachers' students). Inconsistencies between these frames is the rule, but when they overlap, change can be forceful. The author concludes that successful systemic policies may not be those that are inherently aligned packages, but those that align the frames of reference teachers use to make sense of policies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.