Abstract

<p align="LEFT">The changing conception of international education and the instructors’ perception of the’ good student’ is the focus of this study. Differing teaching philosophies and pedagogies in diverse cultures mean different conceptions of the important qualities and appropriate behaviour of students. As the flow of migrating students increases globally, the classrooms become increasingly intercultural, students bring disparate competences and educational values with them, and traditional views on good teaching and good students are no longer ‘givens’.</p><p align="LEFT">When international students fill classrooms in countries far from their own, they risk not having their abilities perceived as being as valuable as those of home students. In the Nordic and Anglophone countries, there is a wellestablished credo of the ‘good student’ as independent and self-motivated – a belief usually ascribed to Western philosophies and traditions hailing back to Humboldt and his ideas of autonomy, freedom, and critical thinking. By contrast, many Asian cultures purportedly honour and respect the instructor’s opinion and established knowledge above the student’s. This study investigates the attitudes of instructors in Canada and Denmark towards these cultural perceptions through the lens of changes in internationalisation over time and space.</p><p align="LEFT">This study argues that, as a first step, instructors should become better grounded in and more explicit about their own traditions and cultural philosophies, so that they can build upon them for international teaching and learning. On the basis of responses from Canadian and Danish scholars, we aim to explore avenues towards a flexible, dynamic, and transnational conception of the good student.</p>

Highlights

  • With the record flows of international students and the adoption of English as the international language medium in the academy come calls for the internationalisation of curriculum content and a broadening of systems of assessment in order to accommodate these students (Leask 2008; Ryan 2010; Tange/Jensen 2012; Truchot/Bloch 2002). These record flows are astonishing as the absolute number of international students rose exponentially from 2002 to 2009 and well beyond that by 2011/2012: According to the UNESCO Institute of Statistics (UIS), the number of globally mobile students increased to 3.4 million students in 2009, up from 2.1 million students in 2000. [T]he four leading destination countries – the U.S, the UK, Australia, and Canada – witnessed sizable growth from 2002 to 2009

  • The analysis of our respondents’ detailed commentaries made it clear that some themes pervaded the discussion across the board. These themes are significant because they illuminate common concerns and beliefs adding new understanding of the ‘good student’ as embedded in internationalisation and changing realities for higher education

  • Our data grouped around the themes of lecturers’ self-image, philosophies of teaching, pertinent ideas of the ‘good student’, perceptions of international students as both positive contributors and a difficulty, a contradictory inclination to treat every student the same while aware of differences, and claims of having made no changes to their classroom practices combined with statements about changing conditions in higher education that affect their teaching

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With the record flows of international students and the adoption of English as the international language medium in the academy come calls for the internationalisation of curriculum content and a broadening of systems of assessment in order to accommodate these students (Leask 2008; Ryan 2010; Tange/Jensen 2012; Truchot/Bloch 2002). These record flows are astonishing as the absolute number of international students rose exponentially from 2002 to 2009 and well beyond that by 2011/2012: According to the UNESCO Institute of Statistics (UIS), the number of globally mobile students increased to 3.4 million students in 2009, up from 2.1 million students in 2000.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.