Changes to the TEF schemes can have significant impacts on regulation and management of PCDD/F and PCB

Abstract

The changes recommended by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to the toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polychlorinated dibenzo- p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDD/F) and the recommendation to extend both the TEF scheme and the tolerable daily intake (TDI) to include “dioxin-like” PCB congeners have significant implications for regulators who have relied heavily on the International TEF (I-TEF) scheme in setting and monitoring limits and exposure to these compounds. This paper examines example data sets of sources, environmental concentrations, food and exposure to indicate likely changes in calculated toxic equivalent (TEQ) due to the recommended changes to TEFs. Many published data sets available do not provide congener specific data for PCDD/F which limits the ability to recalculate TEQs. There are even fewer congener specific data published to enable calculation of TEQs for the dioxin-like PCBs. In general TEQs calculated using the WHO scheme for emissions to air were found to show small increases (in the order of 1–10%) in comparison to the I-TEQ (for PCDD/F), some sludge samples showed substantial decreases (up to 70%). Levels in food and calculations of exposure showed that the change to TEFs for PCDD/F increased calculated exposure by 10–20% while the change to PCB TEFs decreased calculated TEQ attributable to PCB by 0–10%. The effects of including PCB in the overall TEQ and the changes to TEFs for PCDD/F substantially increase calculated TEQ exposure. Congener specific data should be presented to allow calculation of desired TEQ and the impact of the changes on emission limits, regulations on sludge use and environmental quality standards should all be carefully considered. The absence of data on emissions of dioxin-like PCB means that it is not possible to estimate with any certainty the impact on overall TEQ emissions of including the nominated PCB. Given the potential for confusion with the proliferation of TEFs and the extension to include both PCDD/F and PCB in the calculation of TEQs it is important that great care is taken to clearly express which compounds are included and which TEF scheme has been applied in each case.