Abstract
BackgroundMobility aids are commonly prescribed to offload an injured lower extremity. Device selection may impact stance foot loading patterns and foot health in clinical populations at risk of foot ulceration. Research questionsTwo questions motivated this study: How does device selection influence peak plantar and regional (rearfoot, mid foot and forefoot) foot forces on the stance foot? Does device selection influence peak, cumulative, and regional plantar forces within a 200 m walking trial? MethodsTwenty-one older adults walked 200 m at self-selected pace in four randomized conditions for this prospective crossover study. Participants used a walker, crutches, wheeled knee walker (WKW), and no assistive device (control condition). Plantar forces were measured using a wireless in-shoe system (Loadsol, Novel Inc., St. Paul, MN). Repeated measures analyses of variance were used to determine differences in peak and cumulative total and regional forces among walking conditions. Paired sample t-tests compared forces during first and last 30 s epochs of each condition to determine device influence over time. ResultsThe WKW reduced peak net forces by 0.29 and 0.35 bodyweight (BW) when compared to the walker or control condition with similar trends in all foot regions. Crutch use had similar peak forces as control. There were no differences in the number of steps taken within devices comparing first and last epochs. Crutches had a 0.04 and 0.07 BW increase in peak net and forefoot forces during the last epoch. Walker use had 66.44 BW lower cumulative forefoot forces in the last epoch. SignificanceCrutches had similar stance foot loading as normal walking while a walker lowered forefoot forces at the expense of increased steps. A WKW may be the best choice to ‘protect’ tissues in the stance foot from exposure to peak and cumulative forces in the forefoot region.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have