Abstract

This paper uses a typological approach as a tool to establish an analytical framework from a physical perspective to understand ‘place‘ and to identify key spatial characteristics that could adapt to local needs to deliver socio-cultural sustainability. Six representative housing types with their spaces and uses that were introduced in a historic neighborhood in Beijing, China are selected as case studies. Their morphological characteristics at the building, open space and neighborhood scales are examined, and typological transformations among the cases in terms of the degree of spatial continuity are identified. The paper proposes an analytical framework consisting of fifteen indicators to assess socio-cultural sustainability at the different morphological scales (building, open space and block/neighborhood) of the residents of the six cases. The score of changes from its original design is brought into calculations of continuities of spatial characteristics, which present the transitions and transformations of morphological characteristics in relation to adaptation of local needs and uses. The analysis results show that the spatial characteristics were changed when political-socioeconomic ideologies changed, and local needs and uses were transformed to follow these mutations, and finally, the methods of use in different morphological scales mostly differed from historical norms. Although the continuities of spatial characteristics were significantly changed, they are positively and continually accommodating the transformations and transitions of local needs and uses. On the other hand, the invariant spatial characteristics are important, which last despite transformation of the city development and changing of political-social-economic ideologies, and could be maintained for future development to enhance sociocultural sustainability.

Highlights

  • In the past few decades, the international architecture has been accused of incompatibility with the local cultures [1], and is commonly believed to be responsible for placelessness, in China [2,3,4,5]

  • This paper develops an analytical framework from a physical perspective to define changes of spatial characteristics, which could adapt to the changing of needs to deliver socio-cultural sustainability in historical neighborhoods in Beijing

  • It first studies the neighborhood/ block layout to understand the context, it analyzes the transformation of cases from its original design to contemporary configurations by employing a typological approach, which identifies the adaptation of changes of local cultural values, social patterns and uses experiences and perceptions following a chronological order

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the past few decades, the international architecture has been accused of incompatibility with the local cultures [1], and is commonly believed to be responsible for placelessness, in China [2,3,4,5]. Whitehand et al [7] compared the transformation process of terrace house types and lilong houses between England and Shanghai, and aims to identify whether the latter had been influenced by the former around the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries They have contributed to either large-scale city developments or regeneration of specific urban heritage building typology, none of studies look at what spatial characteristics could adapt to local needs and continue to be applied to future development to enhance socio-cultural sustainability, especially in the context of Beijing, China. This paper develops an analytical framework from a physical perspective to define changes of spatial characteristics, which could adapt to the changing of needs to deliver socio-cultural sustainability in historical neighborhoods (vernacular neighborhoods) in Beijing. The developed analytical framework improves efficiency of analysis in identifications of which spatial characteristics adapt to local needs through physical transformations

Research Strategies
Development of Analytical Framework
Identification
Imperial Period
Soviet In
(Tables and
Post-Reform and Contemporary Period
10. Modern
Analysis of Changes of Spatial Characteristics between
Case 2
Key Findings
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call