Abstract

Functional spinopelvic parameters are crucial for describing spinal alignment (SA), but this is susceptible to variation. Anatomically fixed pelvic shape is defined by the parameters pelvic radius (PR), pelvic incidence (PI), and sacral table angle (STA). In patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV), the spinopelvic alignment may be altered by changes of these parameters and influences of SA. There have been no reports studying the relation between LSTV, four (4 LV) and six (6 LV) lumbar vertebrae, and fixed anatomical spinopelvic parameters. A retrospective analysis of 819 abdomen–pelvis CT scans was performed, identifying 53 patients with LSTV. In a matched-pair analysis, we analyzed the influence of LSTV and the subgroups 4 LV (n = 9) and 6 LV (n = 11) on PR, PI, and STA. LSTV were classified according to Castellvi classification. In patients with 6 LV, measurement points at the superior endplates of S1 and S2 were compared. The prevalence of LSTV was 6.5% (53/819), 6 LV was 1.3% (11/819), and 4 LV was 1.1% (9/819) in our study population. PI significantly increased (p < 0.001), STA significantly decreased (p < 0.001), and PR (p = 0.051) did not differ significantly in the LSTV group (n = 53). Similar findings were observed in the 4 LV subgroup, with an increase in PI (p < 0.021), decrease in STA (p < 0.011), and no significant difference in PR (p < 0.678). The same results were obtained in the 6 LV subgroup at measuring point S2 (true S1) PI (p = 0.010), STA (p = 0.004), and PR (p = 0.859), but not at measuring point S1 (true L6). Patients with LSTV, 4 LV, and 6 LV showed significant differences in PI and STA compared to the matched control group. PR showed no significant differences. The altered spinopelvic anatomy in LSTV patients need to be reflected in preoperative planning rebalancing the sagittal SA.

Highlights

  • It is well recognized that spinal sagittal balance and functional spinopelvic parameter are decisive elements in describing spinal alignment [13]

  • Restoration of the sagittal profile is directly related to the improvement of pain and function after spine surgery for various disease states [30,31]

  • It has been discussed that the spinal profile, and the functional spinopelvic parameters, are highly variable, and changes both in the short term during daily activities and in the long term due to degeneration are possible [22]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The spectrum of LSTV is defined by sacralization of the lowest lumbar segment or a lumbarization of the uppermost sacral segment, and was initially classified by Castellvi [4]. This radiological classification, divided into four types, includes dysplastic enlarged costal process, pseudarthrosis, osseous fusion, and a mixed type (Table 1). Incorrect identification of LSTV may lead to misdiagnosis, miscalculation of sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters, and subsequent inappropriate surgical treatment. This clearly underlines the high relevance of this anatomical variant, and should lead to increased attention in routine clinical practice

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call