Abstract

The color of many lakes and seas is changing, which is likely to affect the species composition of freshwater and marine phytoplankton communities. For example, cyanobacteria with phycobilisomes as light‐harvesting antennae can effectively utilize green or orange‐red light. However, recent studies show that they use blue light much less efficiently than phytoplankton species with chlorophyll‐based light‐harvesting complexes, even though both phytoplankton groups may absorb blue light to a similar extent. Can we advance ecological theory to predict how these differences in light‐harvesting strategy affect competition between phytoplankton species? Here, we develop a new resource competition model in which the absorption and utilization efficiency of different colors of light are varied independently. The model was parameterized using monoculture experiments with a freshwater cyanobacterium and green alga, as representatives of phytoplankton with phycobilisome‐based vs. chlorophyll‐based light‐harvesting antennae. The parameterized model was subsequently tested in a series of competition experiments. In agreement with the model predictions, the green alga won the competition in blue light whereas the cyanobacterium won in red light, irrespective of the initial relative abundances of the species. These results are in line with observed changes in phytoplankton community structure in response to lake brownification. Similarly, in marine waters, the model predicts dominance of Prochlorococcus with chlorophyll‐based light‐harvesting complexes in blue light but dominance of Synechococcus with phycobilisomes in green light, with a broad range of coexistence in between. These predictions agree well with the known biogeographical distributions of these two highly abundant marine taxa. Our results offer a novel trait‐based approach to understand and predict competition between phytoplankton species with different photosynthetic pigments and light‐harvesting strategies.

Highlights

  • Phytoplankton provide the base of the food web in freshwater and marine ecosystems (Sterner and Elser 2002, Falkowski 2012), and their photosynthetic activity is responsible for almost 50% of the global primary production (Field et al 1998)

  • It is likely that phytoplankton communities will be affected by these changes in the underwater light spectrum, as they consist of a taxonomically diverse set of species that deploy different photosynthetic pigments and light-harvesting strategies (Ting et al 2002, Kirk 2011, Croce and van Amerongen 2014)

  • Our results show that light color has a major effect on the outcome of competition between phytoplankton species

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Phytoplankton provide the base of the food web in freshwater and marine ecosystems (Sterner and Elser 2002, Falkowski 2012), and their photosynthetic activity is responsible for almost 50% of the global primary production (Field et al 1998). The color of lakes and seas is changing, (Roulet and Moore 2006, Kritzberg 2017, Dutkiewicz et al 2019). It is likely that phytoplankton communities will be affected by these changes in the underwater light spectrum, as they consist of a taxonomically diverse set of species that deploy different photosynthetic pigments and light-harvesting strategies (Ting et al 2002, Kirk 2011, Croce and van Amerongen 2014). Can we use ecological theory to predict which light-harvesting strategies will be favored in which environments?

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call