Abstract

Previous research showed that the ability to make inferences about our own and other’s mental states rely on common brain pathways; particularly in the case of close relationships (e.g., romantic relationships). Despite the evidence for shared neural representations of self and others, less is known about the distributed processing within these common neural networks, particularly whether there are specific patterns of internode communication when focusing on other vs. self. This study aimed to characterize context-sensitive coupling among social brain regions involved in self and other understanding. Participants underwent an fMRI while watching emotional video vignettes of their romantic partner and elaborated on their partner’s (other-condition) or on their own experience (self-condition). We used dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to quantify the associated changes in effective connectivity (EC) in a network of brain regions involved in social cognition including the temporoparietal junction (TPJ), the posterior cingulate (PCC)/precuneus and middle temporal gyrus (MTG). DCM revealed that: the PCC plays a central coordination role within this network, the bilateral MTG receives driving inputs from other nodes suggesting that social information is first processed in language comprehension regions; the right TPJ evidenced a selective increase in its sensitivity when focusing on the other’s experience, relative to focusing on oneself.

Highlights

  • Social neuroscience research has shown that when trying to understand another’s emotional and mental states, we rely on psychological processes and brain systems similar to those that we use to understand our internal states (e.g., Lamm et al, 2016)

  • The extrinsic or directed connections reflect the effective connectivity (EC) between regions, i.e., the effect that one region has on another region, whereas the intrinsic or self-inhibition connections reflect how susceptible a region is to the influence of other regions

  • In the final connectivity architecture: (1) the PCC exerts a positive influence in every region but only receives input from LMTG; (2) the right TPJ (RTPJ) receives input from all the other regions having only one efferent to LMTG; (3) the left TPJ (LTPJ) exerts a negative influence on all the other nodes, which can be interpreted as a ‘‘tonic’’ inhibition (Stephan and Friston, 2010); and (4) in both bilateral regions; i.e., middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and temporoparietal junction (TPJ), the information flows from the left region to the right node

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Social neuroscience research has shown that when trying to understand another’s emotional and mental states, we rely on psychological processes and brain systems similar to those that we use to understand our internal states (e.g., Lamm et al, 2016). Similar brain networks are recruited when processing self and other’s internal states in both affective (Singer et al, 2004; Jackson et al, 2005; Lamm et al, 2011), and cognitive tasks (Ochsner et al, 2004; Mitchell et al, 2006; Lombardo et al, 2010). Consistent with these findings—and supporting the idea that inferring. A previous study, in which participants were presented video-vignettes of their romantic partners, confirmed a significant overlap between the functional anatomy of self and other processing, implicating brain regions associated with both socio-affective and socio-cognitive systems (Esménio et al, 2019)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call