Abstract
The changes in the case-law reflect a necessary evolution of judicial practice which takes into account the general evolution of the law, in close connection with social realities. The respect for the principle of legal certainty requires, however, that the changes be exceptional and necessary in relation to the same legal norm. This is all the more the case of constitutional courts’ case-law, in light of their role and of the effects of the decisions they pronounce over the entire legal system. Starting from these premises, the study presents a series of changes in the case-law of the Constitutional Court of Romania and the reasons that led to the same, in achieving a balance between the need for a dynamic and evolutive approach in the review of constitutionality of legal norms and the requirements of legal certainty.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
