Abstract

Objectives: Hearing improves significantly with bimodal provision, i.e., a cochlear implant (CI) at one ear and a hearing aid (HA) at the other, but performance shows a high degree of variability resulting in substantial uncertainty about the performance that can be expected by the individual CI user. The objective of this study was to explore how auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) of bimodal listeners in response to spoken words approximate the electrophysiological response of normal hearing (NH) listeners.Study Design: Explorative prospective analysis during the first 6 months of bimodal listening using a within-subject repeated measures design.Setting: Academic tertiary care center.Participants: Twenty-seven adult participants with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who received a HiRes 90K CI and continued use of a HA at the non-implanted ear. Age-matched NH listeners served as controls.Intervention: Cochlear implantation.Main Outcome Measures: Obligatory auditory evoked potentials N1 and P2, and the event-related N2 potential in response to monosyllabic words and their reversed sound traces before, as well as 3 and 6 months post-implantation. The task required word/non-word classification. Stimuli were presented within speech-modulated noise. Loudness of word/non-word signals was adjusted individually to achieve the same intelligibility across groups and assessments.Results: Intelligibility improved significantly with bimodal hearing, and the N1–P2 response approximated the morphology seen in NH with enhanced and earlier responses to the words compared to their reversals. For bimodal listeners, a prominent negative deflection was present between 370 and 570 ms post stimulus onset (N2), irrespective of stimulus type. This was absent for NH controls; hence, this response did not approximate the NH response during the study interval. N2 source localization evidenced extended activation of general cognitive areas in frontal and prefrontal brain areas in the CI group.Conclusions: Prolonged and spatially extended processing in bimodal CI users suggests employment of additional auditory–cognitive mechanisms during speech processing. This does not reduce within 6 months of bimodal experience and may be a correlate of the enhanced listening effort described by CI listeners.

Highlights

  • Cochlear implant (CI) technology has experienced remarkable progress within its 40 years of use and, today, supports a high level of auditory performance for many CI users

  • The study objective was to characterize the temporal dynamics of speech processing in bimodal CI users, to explore whether it changes during the first months of CI experience and whether it approximates the characteristics seen in normal hearing (NH)

  • (2) Differences depending on familiarity of the stimuli occur early, at the level of the N1, with an amplitude difference in NH and a latency difference in CI listeners depending on the stimulus category

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cochlear implant (CI) technology has experienced remarkable progress within its 40 years of use and, today, supports a high level of auditory performance for many CI users. CI performance shows a high degree of variability resulting in substantial uncertainty about the performance that can be expected for any individual CI user. Insufficient knowledge on the time interval, which is needed to reach the individual’s maximum speech understanding adds to this uncertainty. While it is largely unexplored if and how alterations following hearing impairment can be reversed, or how they are compensated with CI use, it is of major interest to identify brain processes related to successful hearing rehabilitation, as well as their time course. Tools that allow repeated exploration of central auditory processing during the course of auditory rehabilitation are needed. Because EEG is compatible with the CI device, it allows repeated assessments due to its non-invasiveness, and its high temporal resolution is appropriate for outlining the dynamics of the brain’s response to verbally presented speech

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call