Abstract

Abstract Research into sociocultural factors affecting the use of spatial frames of reference (FoR) has begun to move away from characterizing FoR choice as inherent to each language, instead emphasizing variation within speech communities, but has so far paid little attention to variation in individual speaker’s FoR use with different addressees. This paper reports on differences in two senior adults’ use of FoRs in Iwaidja when addressing a peer compared to addressing a child. Performing the Man and Tree task, the speakers made frequent use of geocentric descriptions with their peers, and substantially fewer geocentric descriptions with a child. The study was conducted in a complex multilingual speech environment where younger generations’ language use is shifting away from Iwaidja towards English and to other Australian languages. Factors motivating the different FoR choices in child-directed speech may include elements of parentese and accommodation to the children’s incomplete acquisition of Iwaidja. The children’s contact with English, particularly through schooling, may affect the adults’ expectations of the children’s acquisition of frames of reference in English. Drawing attention to the impact of the addressee in spatial speech, this study adds to understanding sociocultural elements of spatial reference in the context of language contact and shift.

Highlights

  • Typologies of spatial frames of reference have been used to classify languages according to their resources and the preferences of their speakers (e.g. Levinson 2003)

  • This paper reports on differences in two senior adults’ use of frames of reference (FoR) in Iwaidja when addressing a peer compared to addressing a child

  • This paper reports on differences between senior adults’ uses of frames of reference in Iwaidja when talking with a peer and with a child

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Typologies of spatial frames of reference have been used to classify languages according to their resources and the preferences of their speakers (e.g. Levinson 2003). Typologies of spatial frames of reference have been used to classify languages according to their resources and the preferences of their speakers The sociotopographic model proposes that engagement with the environment in daily activities influences frame of reference use, with studies focussing on variation between groups of speakers of the same language (Palmer et al 2017). Research into intergenerational changes in uses of frames of reference in contexts of language shift has moved away from characterizing frame of reference use as inherent to each language, focussing instead on speaker or group preference (Adamou 2017; Cerqueglini 2018 and this vol.; Meakins 2011). Much elicitation of spatial language is conducted through paired speaker-ininteraction tasks, little attention far has been given to variation in frame of reference use of individual speakers with different interlocutors. This study adds to the understanding of the sociocultural elements of spatial reference, in a context of language contact and shift, by considering the impact of addressee on spatial language

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call