Abstract

AbstractUnderstanding the distribution of fire severity patches across a landscape is of critical importance to managers and researchers. Of particular interest are those areas that burn multiple times. Understanding the complexity of these “multiple entry, mixed severity” patches is an important component of managing the landscape. We investigated the role that initial fire severity might play on subsequent fire severity (for a given re-burned area) to assess whether high severity patch distribution was impacted by initial burn conditions. In our study area, the North Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, USA, the fire severity patch distribution of one fire had little influence on the fire severity distribution of a subsequent fire and second entry severity patches were distributed on top of the first entry severity patches in a close to random distribution. Of all areas that burned twice between 2000 and 2011 on the North Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, 48 % burned with equal severity, 26 % burned with a lower severity, and 26 % burned with a higher severity in the second fire. The majority of the agreement can be attributed to a similarity in the proportions of each severity class and not to a match in the spatial allocation of the equal severity patches on first and second entry fires. The distribution of high severity patches showed little change when comparing post-first entry and post-second entry distributions. The mean and the standard deviation of the high severity patch size did not change after a second fire entry. The total area of high severity did increase; this was due to both the addition of new patches as well the growth of existing patches. These findings can help to inform land managers about the roles that fire-on-fire events play on the landscape and how those interactions may impact management goals and decisions.

Highlights

  • Spatial attributes of ecological processes, such as fire, are of interest to both researchers and land managers

  • We found that on second entry, 25.9 % of the twice-burned area burned with a higher severity, 26.2 % burned with a lower severity, and 47.8 % burned with the same severity in the second fire

  • We were constrained in precision by the resolution of the 30 m pixels of the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS) data, spatially by the administrative boundaries of the North Rim, and temporally by the availability of field calibrated fire severity data (i.e., Composite Burn Index (CBI) data for this study are only available from 2000 to 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spatial attributes of ecological processes, such as fire, are of interest to both researchers and land managers. The effects of fire vary greatly on both spatial as well as temporal scales (Morgan et al 2001). Quantitative information on the spatial and temporal diversity of fire can be helpful in qualifying and better understanding the effects of fire in an ecosystem (Conedera et al 2009). Quantifying the distribution of fire severity can highlight both the changes that fire brings to an area as well as the influences of initial change from a past fire on subsequent change from future fires. Strategic and tactical decisions in fire management are influenced by knowing what fires have done in the past and what fires can be expected to do in the future, especially regarding persistent changes to vegetation. The extent of high severity patches has ecological consequences for vegetation and wildlife dispersal and maintenance of landscape-scale diversity

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call