Changes in running economy and running technique following 6 months of running with and without wearable-based real-time feedback.

Abstract

An increasing number of commercially available wearables provide real-time feedback on running biomechanics with the aim to reduce injury risk or improve performance. Investigate whether real-time feedback by wearable insoles (ARION) alters running biomechanics and improves running economy more as compared to unsupervised running training. We also explored the correlation between changes in running biomechanics and running economy. Forty recreational runners were randomized to an intervention and control group and performed ~6 months of in-field training with or without wearable-based real-time feedback on running technique and speed. Running economy and running biomechanics were measured in lab conditions without feedback pre and post intervention at four speeds. Twenty-two individuals (13 control, 9 intervention) completed both tests. Both groups significantly reduced their energetic cost by an average of -6.1% and -7.7% for the control and intervention groups, respectively. The reduction in energy cost did not significantly differ between groups overall (-0.07 ± 0.14 J∙kg∙m-1 , -1.5%, p = 0.63). There were significant changes in spatiotemporal metrics, but their magnitude was minor and did not differ between the groups. There were no significant changes in running kinematics within or between groups. However, alterations in running biomechanics beyond typical session-to-session variation were observed during some in-field sessions for individuals that received real-time feedback. Alterations in running biomechanics as observed during some in-field sessions for individuals receiving wearable-based real-time feedback did not result in significant differences in running economy or running biomechanics when measured in controlled lab conditions without feedback.