Abstract

Covid-19 lockdown restrictions constitute a population-wide “life-change event” disrupting normal daily routines. It was proposed that as a result of these lockdown restrictions, physical activity levels would likely decline. However, it could also be argued that lifestyle disruption may result in the formation of increased physical activity habits. Using a longitudinal design, the purpose of this study was to investigate changes in physical activity of different intensities, across individuals who differed in activity levels prior to lockdown restrictions being imposed, and across three time periods: pre-, during- and post-lockdown. This study also examined the extent to which the experience of daily hassles explained any changes in physical activity. A convenience sample (N = 759) recruited through social media, provided data from an online survey administered during weeks 2–3 of a 5-week lockdown and 231 participants provided complete data again 6 weeks post-lockdown (72% female, M age = 43 years). Participants completed the International Physical Activity Questionnaire–Short Form and the Daily Hassles Scale. Results showed that vigorous and moderate intensity PA were significantly lower during- and post-lockdown compared to pre-lockdown in those individuals who had been highly active pre-lockdown. In contrast, for moderately active individuals pre-lockdown, vigorous and moderate intensity PA was significantly higher during-lockdown compared to pre-lockdown, and these increased levels of vigorous PA were maintained post-lockdown. Participants experienced daily hassles due to inner concerns, time pressures, family, and financial concerns to the same extent during- and post-lockdown. Those daily hassles had a small negative (Standardized β = −0.11; p < 0.05) predictive effect on post-lockdown PA. It appears that to understand the effect of COVID-19 restrictions on PA, the activity status of individuals pre-lockdown needs to be taken into account. The daily hassles appeared to play a role in post-lockdown PA behavior, but future research should investigate why these results occurred.

Highlights

  • In March 2020, the New Zealand (NZ) Government instigated Level 4 lockdown restrictions in response to the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 pandemic (World Health Organisation, 2020)

  • The interaction results showed that lockdown restrictions significantly affected vigorous intensity [F(2,220) = 30.07, p < 0.001, partial eta2 = 0.22] and moderate physical activity (PA) [F(2,220) = 9.87, p < 0.001, partial eta2 = 0.08], but not walking [F(2,220) = 1.493, p = 0.23]

  • The results showed that vigorous PA [F(2, 238) = 14.18, p < 0.001, partial eta2 = 0.11], moderate PA [F(1.41, 168.21) = 20.82, p < 0.001, partial eta2 = 0.15] and walking [F(2, 238) = 3.54, p ≤ 0.03, partial eta2 = 0.03] were affected by the lockdown restrictions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In March 2020, the New Zealand (NZ) Government instigated Level 4 lockdown restrictions in response to the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 pandemic (World Health Organisation, 2020). These Level 4 lockdown restrictions ( termed “lockdown”) urged all New Zealanders (except those classed as essential workers) to stay at home unless undertaking a limited range of “essential” activities (e.g., shopping for groceries, medical reasons) (New Zealand Government, 2020a). The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated restrictions have resulted in substantial psychosocial effects, for example increased prevalence of anxiety and stress (Salari et al, 2020), which physical activity (PA) is known to ameliorate (Stubbs et al, 2017). Researchers have opinionated on the importance of being physically active during the pandemic (Chen et al, 2020; Hudson and Sprow, 2020; Lippi et al, 2020; Ricci et al, 2020; Sallis and Pratt, 2020)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call