Changes in mandibular mobility after different procedures of orthognathic surgery.

Abstract

A prospective study including 63 adult Class II and Class III patients was carried out in order to examine short- and long-term effects of four different treatment methods on mandibular mobility. The patients were treated either (Group A, control-group) orthodontically alone or (Group B) by a LeFort I-osteotomy, a (Group C) mandibular advancement or (Group D) a two-jaw surgery/mandibular set-back. In the surgery-groups (B, C, and D) maximum opening, protrusion and lateral excursions were measured 2 days pre-operatively (T0), and 3, 8, 14.5, and 25.5 months post-operatively (T1-T4). In the control-group (A) at T0 and T4 was measured, only. Significantly differing effects of the four treatment methods on mandibular mobility were detected. (A) Orthodontic treatment alone, (B) maxillary advancement by LeFort I osteotomy, and (D) two-jaw surgery/mandibular set-back osteotomy did not influence mandibular mobility permanently. Temporary decreases in groups B and D (P less than or equal to 0.05) were observed, however. In contrast, permanent reductions after (C) mandibular advancement took place (P less than or equal to 0.001). Longitudinal survey showed that in all surgery groups recoveries were limited to a short period of 3-14.5 months, depending on the movement. Surprisingly, a closer similarity between the LeFort-I group (B) and the two-jaw surgery group (D), rather than between the sagittal-split groups (C and D), was seen indicating that the problem of reduced mobility after orthognathic surgery can be limited to Class II therapy. It was concluded that in Class III therapy, the application of rigid fixation in combination with a method of maintaining condyle-position, thereby dispensing with maxillomandibular fixation, prevents permanent reductions in mobility and guarantees a rapid recovery to pre-operative mobility levels.