Changes in extreme precipitation events in the Zambezi River basins based on CORDEX‐CORE models: Part I—Evaluation of historical simulation

Abstract

AbstractThis study evaluates the ability of the Coordinated Output for Regional Evaluations (CORE) initiated under the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) to reproduce austral summer extreme precipitation indices over the Zambezi River basin (ZRB) from 1983 to 2005. The ability of the RCMs to simulate the spatial distributions of observed extreme precipitation was assessed using multiple datasets. The spatially averaged performance of the CORDEX‐CORE ensemble mean (CORE‐ENS) and RCM ensembles (RCM‐ENSEMBLES developed from different combinations of CORE‐ENS ensemble members) was evaluated using statistical metrics. The results showed similarities in the spatial distribution of extreme precipitation among the observations. However, there were considerable differences in the magnitude of extreme precipitation among the observations. The frequency of days with very heavy precipitation (R20) showed the largest differences in magnitude among the observations. Although there are differences in magnitude, CORE‐ENS, its ensemble members, and RCM‐ENSEMBLES can capture the spatial distribution of extreme precipitation. Specifically, CORE‐ENS, its ensemble members, and RCM‐ENSEMBLES overestimated (underestimated) the frequency of rainy days (RR1) and maximum consecutive wet days (CWD) (maximum consecutive dry days [CDD]). In contrast, some members of CORE‐ENS overestimate, while others underestimate, the simple daily intensity index (SDII), the frequency of days with heavy precipitation (R10), and R20, depending on the choice of reference data. The Consortium for Small‐scale MOdelling in CLimate Mode (CCLM) and Regional MOdel (REMO) performed better than the Regional Climate Model (RegCM4.7) in simulating the spatial distributions of extreme precipitation. The regionally averaged uncertainties (biases) of the CORE‐ENS, its ensemble members, and RCMENSEMBLES were within the range of those in the observational datasets, except for CWD (CWD and RR1). Overall, CORE‐ENS performed better than its ensemble members in simulating extreme precipitation.