Abstract

Background: Previous studies have provided controversal results on the development of the skills of decision-making skill and skill execution when tactical models of the teaching of a game were used. Objective: The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of two different combined technical-tactical instructional models on the development of decision-making skill and ball skill execution during a soccer match in female students. Methods: Two groups of female students aged 20.9±0.7 years underwent the 5-week soccer training intervention, consisting of two 90 min. training units a week, based on the technical-tactical model with an emphasis on orientation to tactical and technical skills, respectively (CTA and CTE students, respectively). Before and after the intervention, students' decision-making skill and ball skill execution in a match were assessed from videorecords of matches using the Soccer performance observation system (SPOS). In addition, the Soccer skill test battery (Mor, & Christian, 1979) was used to assess the ball skills under control environment. Results: The skill execution index (SEI) after intervention in both CTA and CTE students (0.58 ± 0.15 and 0.65 ± 0.11) found using SPOS were significantly higher in comparison to SEI before the intervention (0.46 ± 0.13 and 0.50 ± 0.09; p < 0.05 and p < 0.01). Similarly, the decision-making index (DMI) was significantly enhanced after intervention in the cases of both CTA students (from 0.70 ± 0.14 to 0.81 ± 0.12, p < 0.05) and CTE students (from 0.65 ± 0.11 to 0.75 ± 0.12, p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study showed that instructional models with both dominant tactical tasks and dominant technical tasks can result in the significant improvement of both decision-making and skill execution performance in young adult subjects. The study suggested that both decision-making in game situations and ball skill execution can be developed through implicit learning.

Highlights

  • Game performance in sport games is underlied by the perceptual-cognitive processes leading to decision making about movement response and senso-motor processes responsible for skill execution

  • There has been considerable debate about how much emphasis should be placed on technical skills, and how much on players’ awareness of game tactics and their decision making skills to improve game performance (Starkes, Ericsson, & Anders, 2003; Williams & Hodges, 2004)

  • The tactical model of teaching was derived from ideas of the teaching games for understanding (TgfU) model (Mitchell, Oslin, & Griffin, 2006; Butler & Cahan, 2005) and presented a shift from an instructional approach emphasising learning technical skills called the traditional or technical model (Rink, French, & Tjeerdsma, 1996), for the dominant style of teaching of decision making skills

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Game performance in sport games is underlied by the perceptual-cognitive processes leading to decision making about movement response and senso-motor processes responsible for skill execution. The tactical model of teaching was derived from ideas of the teaching games for understanding (TgfU) model (Mitchell, Oslin, & Griffin, 2006; Butler & Cahan, 2005) and presented a shift from an instructional approach emphasising learning technical skills called the traditional or technical model (Rink, French, & Tjeerdsma, 1996), for the dominant style of teaching of decision making skills. Previous studies on the effects of the tactical model in some sport games provided mixed or controversal results when this model did not demonstrate significant benefits in the development of both the cognitive and motor components of game performance in comparison to the technical based instructional models (Harrison, Blakemore, Richards, Oliver, Wilkinson, & Fellingham, 2004; French, Werner, Taylor, Hussey, & Jones, 1996; Turner & Martinek, 1995). Previous studies have provided controversal results on the development of the skills of decision making skill and skill execution when tactical models of the teaching of a game were used

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call